Low & No Alcohol Drinks vs Full-Strength Low Calorie Wine: Which Is Better?

The low and no alcohol market has exploded. Many health-conscious drinkers assume these must be the smarter choice. The reality is more nuanced: many low and no alcohol drinks contain significantly more sugar than their full-strength counterparts, and the calorie saving can be smaller than expected.

The catch: sugar in low and no alcohol drinks

McGuigan's mid-strength wine (7% ABV), marketed as healthier, contains almost 16g of sugar per bottle. Our own TRACES Sauvignon Blanc at 11% ABV contains 0g of sugar. Heineken 0.0 contains 1.3g of sugar per 330ml. Full-strength Heineken contains less than 0.5g. Lean Brew IPA (4.5% ABV) contains 0g of sugar and 3g of carbs total.

Calories: the comparison

The calorie saving of going alcohol-free is modest — often 30–50 kcal per glass. The sugar penalty can be significant. For people managing blood sugar, following keto, or simply wanting the lowest possible glycaemic impact, a full-strength zero-sugar wine like those at DrinkWell is often a better choice than a sweetened alcohol-free alternative.

Shop at DrinkWell

• → Low calorie wine — full-strength, from 76 kcal, 0g sugar
• → Low calorie beer — full or near-full strength, from 60 kcal
• → Keto alcohol — 0g sugar, confirmed carbs on every product page
• → Lower in alcohol — our selection of lower-ABV options

• Share on Facebook
• Tweet on Twitter
• Pin on Pinterest