Browse Related Products
Is Non-Alcoholic Beer Lower in Calories?
Related Products
Liquid error (sections/article line 236): Could not find asset snippets/product-card-article.liquid
Liquid error (sections/article line 236): Could not find asset snippets/product-card-article.liquid
Yes, and by roughly half. A 330ml can of alcohol-free lager typically lands between 65 and 80 calories against about 133 for the full-strength version.
What almost nobody mentions is what happens to the sugar. Several mainstream alcohol-free beers carry more of it than the beer they're imitating, and in a couple of cases considerably more.
So the saving is real. It just isn't free.
Alcohol-free beer calories compared
Look along the rows rather than just down the calorie column. The alcohol-free versions save you roughly half the calories and then hand back 50 to 85% more carbohydrate, most of it as sugar.
The Peroni is the clearest case. Nearly 10g of sugar in a can is about two and a half teaspoons, in a product people generally pick up because they're being careful.
Why taking the alcohol out doesn't halve the calories
Beer draws its calories from two places. Alcohol carries 7 calories per gram, close to fat at 9, as the NHS sets out. Carbohydrate from the grain carries 4.
Remove the alcohol and you delete one of those. The grain carbohydrate stays exactly where it was.
Then there's a second problem. Alcohol carries an enormous amount of a beer's body, sweetness perception and aroma. Strip it out and what remains tastes thin, watery and faintly of wet bread. Brewers have to put something back.
That's where the sugar comes from. Some producers halt fermentation early, so the grain sugars never convert to alcohol in the first place and simply remain in the finished beer. Others ferment fully, remove the alcohol, then add sugar or juice back in to rebuild the palate.
Either route leaves you with a drink that is lower in calories and higher in sugar than the original.
How alcohol-free beer is actually made
Three methods, and they produce noticeably different results.
Arrested fermentation. The brewer stops the yeast early, usually by chilling. Cheap and simple, but it leaves a lot of unconverted sugar and often a distinctly worty, sweet character.
Vacuum distillation. The beer is brewed normally, then the alcohol is boiled off at low pressure so it evaporates at a temperature that doesn't cook the beer. Better flavour retention, more expensive.
Reverse osmosis. The beer is pushed through a membrane that separates alcohol and water from everything else. The alcohol is removed and the rest is recombined. This is generally the best of the three for flavour, and generally the priciest.
The method isn't printed on the can, but the sugar figure gives you a decent hint. A very sweet alcohol-free beer has usually been made by arrested fermentation.
Why alcohol-free beer has taken off
The category has grown faster than almost anything else on the shelf, and the reasons are worth understanding because they explain the sugar problem.
Ten years ago alcohol-free beer was genuinely poor. The technology to remove alcohol without wrecking the flavour was expensive and mostly reserved for large brewers, so what reached the shelf was usually arrested-fermentation beer: sweet, thin and closer to malt drink than to lager.
Vacuum distillation and reverse osmosis changed that. The big international brewers invested heavily, and the quality gap narrowed sharply. Alcohol-free versions of familiar brands now taste recognisably like the originals, which is what moved the category from novelty to normal.
But the underlying problem never went away. Alcohol contributes body, warmth and a perception of sweetness that nothing else in beer replicates. Every producer has to decide how to compensate, and sugar remains the cheapest and most reliable answer. That's why quality improved dramatically while the nutritional profile largely didn't.
It also explains the spread in the table above. Two alcohol-free lagers can differ by nearly 6g of sugar per can because their brewers made different choices about how to rebuild the palate.
What "alcohol-free" legally means
Three terms, three different thresholds, and they are not interchangeable.
A drink at 0.5% is a meaningful distinction if you're avoiding alcohol for medical, religious or recovery reasons. Worth reading the number rather than the word.
The labelling quirk nobody expects
Here's something genuinely odd about this category.
Drinkaware notes that alcoholic drinks above 1.2% ABV are not legally required to display calorie information in the UK, and that research by the Portman Group found fewer than half do so voluntarily. But alcohol-free and low alcohol drinks at 1.2% ABV or below fall outside that exemption and must carry full nutritional labelling.
So the alcohol-free category is one of the only corners of the drinks aisle where you can actually read what's in the can. Which is faintly ironic, because it's also the corner where the sugar figures are least flattering.
The upshot is practical: if you're standing in a supermarket comparing an alcohol-free lager with a full-strength one, only one of them will tell you anything. Turn the alcohol-free can round and read it.
Is alcohol-free beer good for you?
It's better than the alternative on several fronts, and it isn't a health drink.
The clearest benefit is the obvious one. No alcohol means none of the effects of alcohol, and Drinkaware estimates that for adults who drink regularly, nearly 9% of their daily calorie intake comes from alcohol. Removing that is a substantial change.
The counterweight is the sugar. The NHS recommends adults have no more than 30g of free sugars a day, roughly seven sugar cubes. Three cans of a sweeter alcohol-free lager gets you most of the way there, from a drink you probably didn't count.
None of which is an argument against alcohol-free beer. It's an argument for reading the can, which you can, because the law makes them print it.
Where low calorie beer fits
Low calorie beer solves a different problem, and it's worth being clear that it isn't a substitute.
Rather than removing the alcohol, these beers are fermented out further. More of the grain sugar is converted into alcohol, so less carbohydrate remains at the end. Full strength, lower carbs, and nothing added back to compensate.
The carbohydrate column is where the gap is. An alcohol-free lager carries 15 to 18g a can. Tennents Light carries 0.8g and The Löwecal Lager carries none at all.
On calories the two categories sit closer together, because ours keep their alcohol and alcohol is calorific. Serving sizes also differ between brands, so check the individual product pages rather than assuming a like-for-like comparison.
So which should you buy?
They answer different questions, and we'd rather say that than pretend otherwise.
Alcohol-free beer is right when the alcohol is the thing you're avoiding. Driving, pregnant, on medication, in recovery, doing a dry month, or simply not drinking tonight. Nothing about carbohydrate content changes that, and no amount of clever fermentation substitutes for zero alcohol.
Low calorie beer is right when you want a proper beer at a proper strength and you'd rather it wasn't carrying 20g of carbohydrate. It is not a stepping stone to going alcohol-free and shouldn't be sold as one.
If you're counting carbs specifically, read the label whichever way you go. The alcohol-free category will tell you. The full-strength one usually won't.
Common questions
Does alcohol-free beer have sugar? Often more than the full-strength version, because sugar is what replaces the body and sweetness that the alcohol was providing. Figures range from around 4g to nearly 10g per 330ml.
Is alcohol-free beer fattening? Less so than regular beer on calories alone. But a sweeter alcohol-free lager can contribute meaningfully to your daily sugar intake, and the calories still count.
Can you drink alcohol-free beer while driving? Anything labelled alcohol-free at 0.05% ABV or below is fine. Products at 0.5% contain a trace amount, which is negligible but not nothing.
Is alcohol-free beer keto? Generally not. At 15 to 18g of carbohydrate a can it's one of the higher-carb options available. Our keto beer range sits at 4g or below.
How does it compare with wine? A dry wine at 0g sugar carries almost no carbohydrate, so on carbs it beats alcohol-free beer comfortably. We've compared the categories in wine vs beer calories.
Related reading
Shop
Brand figures are approximate and taken from published information, which producers do reformulate. Please drink responsibly. UK guidance is no more than 14 units a week, spread across three or more days, with several drink-free days.
Browse Lower Calorie Beers